I've been hugely enjoying these waning days of West Side Greenway commuting before darkness sets in, because -- much as I hate upper Broadway in any case, particularly at night -- I have no interest in riding the Greenway at night.
Here's one reason:
Briefly back to yesterday's photos.
A caveat first -- the fact that we have these different settings is not, unfortunately, the result of any purposeful action on my part. I wish. No, instead, it resulted from my fiddling with the camera in the dark trying to get something to turn out right. I have enough trouble dealing with Exposure Issues in the daylight. Can I get it right in the dark? I think not. Especially when my contact is maladjusted and I can't even see the settings on the camera.
Still, I can backtrack after the fact and compare the settings vs. the result, and learn something from that. When I have time, I'll modify this entry to add them.
But at any rate, I'm fascinated by this question they raise: What is reality? (Too deep for 5:18 a.m.)
What was the sky really like at that hour? When does the scene become not what it is, but just what I say it is, simply by tweaking the exposure?
This is differing from cutting a person out of one scene and putting him into another. That one's obvious. But just a little tweak of an F-stop or something, and all of a sudden the sunrise, sunset, moonlight, whatever, may be completely different from whatever reality there was to begin with.
Of course, the same question exists for any photo ever taken and tweaked ever so slightly in the camera or the computer. And for that matter, for any story ever written. And angles and detail and what to leave in, what to take out ... all of that. It just struck me that with three lightings of the same scene, it's more apparent than usual.
Recent Comments